Skip to content
Prabhu Raja
Design Tools · AI Tools

BriefWise — UX Brief Refiner

A tool that turns a messy stakeholder request into a structured UX brief — problem, objectives, assumptions, potential requirements and the questions still unanswered.

RoleDesigner & Builder
TimelineOct 2026
IndustryDesign Tools / Productivity
Built withNext.jsTypeScriptTailwind CSSClaude CodeVercel AI SDKGroqZodVercel
01

Context

Design work often starts from a stakeholder request that is a few loose sentences — a problem, a wish, a deadline — with the real brief still missing. BriefWise set out to close that gap by structuring the request before work begins, so the open questions surface on day one instead of mid-project.

02

The Challenge

The hard part was honesty. A tool that fills in a brief can easily present guesses as facts, so the output had to separate what the stakeholder actually said from what is inferred, and make the gaps as visible as the answers.

03

Research

Tested the refiner with short requests like 'we need a new website because the old one is outdated' and checked whether the output kept stated facts apart from inference — and whether the missing information showed up as questions rather than invented detail.

Review of how briefs and discovery notes are structured in UX practiceAnalysis of typical stakeholder requests and the information they leave outIterative testing of the refiner against short, vague requestsPrompt iteration with schema-validated output so every brief keeps the same shape
04

Insights

The key findings that shaped the direction.

01

A vague request hides more than it states

Most requests name a problem and a solution but skip users, constraints and success measures — the gaps matter as much as the content, so they need to be shown, not smoothed over.

02

Inference is useful only when it's labelled

Potential requirements and assumptions help a designer move faster, but only if they are clearly marked as possibilities to confirm rather than agreed scope.

03

A brief is a working document, not a verdict

The generated brief is a first draft. Designers need to edit every section and carry it into their own process, so the output had to be editable and portable.

05

Design Strategy

How decisions were made.

01

Separate what was said from what was inferred

Opened the brief with the stakeholder's words verbatim, then labelled every section — 'Based on what was stated', 'Possibilities to review, not confirmed requirements', 'Unconfirmed, validate before relying on' — so the evidence behind each line is clear.

02

Make the gaps the headline

Added a Brief health summary that lists what is clear and what is missing — primary users, constraints, success measures — and highlighted the questions section so open items can't be overlooked.

03

Keep the designer in control

Made every section editable and framed the page as 'Your working brief', so the AI draft is a starting point the designer owns rather than a finished answer.

04

Make the result easy to take with you

Added one-click Copy brief, Markdown export and Print, with a sticky section index, so the brief can move straight into a doc, ticket or kickoff.

05

Say plainly where the text goes

Stated on the About page that there are no accounts, nothing is stored on a server, drafts stay in the browser's local storage, and text is sent to an AI service only when you refine. The AI call runs server-side only, so no keys ever reach the browser.

06

Build solo, with AI as the engineering partner

Designed and built end-to-end using Claude Code as a development partner — from the system prompt and output schema to the interface — while keeping every UX and product decision in my hands.

06

Solution

A focused refinement tool: paste a stakeholder request, and BriefWise returns a structured, editable UX brief that separates stated facts from inference and lists exactly what still needs to be answered.

Nine-section brief — stakeholder request, problem, objectives, user problem, potential requirements, assumptions, open questions and next steps
Brief health summary showing what is clear and what is still a gap
Clear labels separating stated content from inferences to validate
Every section editable, with Refine again to run the request through the tool once more
Copy, Markdown and Print output, with a sticky section index
Schema-validated AI output (Zod) so every brief has the same structure, with a rate limiter and input validation on the server
No accounts and no server-side storage — drafts stay in the browser
Selected screens

A look at the work.

BriefWise refiner showing the working brief with a Brief health summary of clear items and gaps

The live product at getbriefwise.vercel.app — Brief health shows what is clear and what is missing.

BriefWise brief sections for problem, business objectives, user problem and potential requirements

Structured sections, each labelled by how much of it was actually stated.

BriefWise highlighted questions requiring clarification and recommended next steps

Open questions are highlighted so the gaps are impossible to miss.

07

Design System Thinking

This project wasn't designed as a one-off — here's how it connects back to the system.

Components

A shared section pattern — heading, evidence label, editable content — reused across every part of the brief.

Tokens

A restrained warm-orange accent reserved for primary actions and open questions, so attention goes to what needs a decision.

Patterns

An evidence-label convention — stated, inferred, unconfirmed — applied consistently so confidence is visible at a glance.

Governance

The system prompt enforces a know / assume / still-need-to-know split and forbids inventing facts, statistics or constraints. Privacy is stated in the product: nothing stored on a server, text sent to an AI service only when refining, and a confirmation step before a saved brief is discarded.

08

Impact

BriefWise shipped as a small, single-purpose tool that turns an unclear request into a structured starting point for design — one that is upfront about what is still unknown.

9Structured brief sections
8,000Character input limit
0Accounts or server-side storage
09

Reflection

The temptation was to make the brief look complete. Treating the gaps and open questions as the most important part of the output — and labelling every inference — is what keeps the tool useful instead of misleading.

Next projectRATIO — 60–30–10 Color Balance Tool
View project

Have a complex challenge? Let's design something meaningful.